Not Another 'Corporate Right, it is Copyleft, Creative Commons.... Rather than Propagating Trademark Radio and other forms of media that do the same..

 

 

 

Aside from Links of Integration being more properly rendered here, this is the same as what was "posted" in Boston's Independent Media Center (IMC). G/E could accept if one deemed what was written overall to be "incorherent" even if it might have several possibly interesting connections but it was "Banned in Boston Then, Hidden in Boston (IMC) Now" for the reason that the electronic mail address that was chosen (and presume because not "verified") was such as done in the past, an attenpt to maybe be informative in the email name place holder. Some examples from the past include "not@corporate-domain.org, not at ola.com, etc. (granted there were following the e-mail form). This time chosing a variation of the phrase "the threat of a good example"

appears to have been too much a threat to one's acceptance of "coherence."

 

Commentary: Organizing  
Not another 'Corporate Right (but Copyleft, CC...)  
by "the threat of [an active citizenry]"  04 Dec 2005  
Hidden by The Oppressor with code: Empty
Notes: Incoherent e-mail string
[This follow-up of sorts to the "note"

(falling back to the terminology of VAXNotes with its "base notes", i.e., 135.0 and such for tracking "replies" will have to wait to say more on this) on WJUL, now WUML, was meant to say something about how Boston's IMC rightly uses the default "Public Domain" setting if one selects a partical Creative Commons license without selecting the Main CC Heading. This will be carried on here - where it will not go "hidden."

 

[The WJUL/WUML Newswire posting] was not written with the intent to propagate a 'Corporate right (Copyright), it was supposed to have been a Creative Commons license.

 

[Hopefully what follows won't also "play" too much with "words" and the coherent flow of thoughts as say ] "the Lesser"

does in his playing with words and history. Needless to say when he "communicates" there's often times not much general consequent critical questioning of what has been articulated even if read from "prepared" remarks.

 

But for others, why propagate the quote that leaves out: how can he write such nonsense about international affairs and foreign policy?", like the other often referenced incomplete quote: My Country right or wrong... ("Right or wrong, my country. If it's right, keep it right. If it's wrong, make it right.

")

 

See 2000: The Social and Political Thought of Noam Chomsky by Alison Edgley and The American Creed: A Spiritual and Patriotic Primer., or propagate anything unless you value what you're spreading, or "persuading others" to do.

 

This sort of update on 91.5 FM WJUL, now WUML (and of course WMFO when you're virtually anywhere in the world but if depending on the current radio signal presumably relatively close by) it was certainly not an intent to 'corporate right what was "posted" ( http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/46648/index.php ) .

 

Again it t was meant to be one of the Creative Commons

licenses, and at the same time to maybe facilitate more people knowing there are other ways; one may be more likely to "persuade others to persuade themselves" if they do know.

 

One "side note", in some realms one is not likely to hear much about free software other than that which can be downloaded for "no charge"; maybe even from those you would think would give other choices besides proprietary audio formats and players (even if they "play" other formats), or see something besides the potential, if not already, for the time being, "the Search Index of Record" - not a luddite, but can still value and be critically concerned.

 

And for distintions between "wholesale" and "retail terrorism" you could see the source of what is here "Excerpted from The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, 1979" ( http://www.chomsky.info/books/washington01.htm ) since public libraries still exist or you could support some independent publisher or some other thing that "crackpots" might value doing.

 

Needless to say, again certain realms, unlikely to hear Saddam and those three words: "with [US] support" - read here: "On the Afghanistan War, American Terrorism, and the Role of Intellectuals" ( http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20020116.htm ) or maybe your were "tuned" into WZBC, Truth and Justice Radio on Sunday, 4 December 2005 - "Transcript and Audio of Scott Ritter on war with Iraq and Iran - Amherst - November 17, 2005" ( http://www.traprockpeace.org/podcasts_transcripts/ ).

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast

 

And then there's generic technologies and other things that begin or still are rather generic but then begin to be frequently associated with some Propriatary Other Dominion (best one can do right now).

 

(Stan et all, where's your website" besides (thankful for it but, besides) "playlist"; even that guy (Martin Voelker) with his fixation on the number of peope who ignore those "No-U-Turn Radio" signs, or should I say signals, had one - but it is "gone" now.

 

Amazing to hear someone rather prominent, whatever that means, from 'Hoax News (maybe during this: "American Perspectives A tribute to Rep. John Dingell") with surely a flawed argument, something along the lines that profit, in terms of some threshold number of people to watch something that has little to do with concerns of actual people, future generations, non-human-animals, "Hegemony or Survival" (http://www.bpl.org/general/associates/literarylights.htm -imagine seeing this book displayed at BPL - you would expect such things, ought not be a surprise, just like seeing http://www.afsc.org/ display, etc. The phrase was "you can lead a horse..." suggesting not enought consumers for NEtWorked adS ("NEWS") for such programs. The same argument must apply for the details concerning "preventive contracts, opps, mean "preventive war" since relatively infrequentl hear this sizable difference between this and "pre-emptive" Preventive War "the Supreme Crime' Iraq: invasion that will live in infamy" ( http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm? SectionID=40&ItemID=4030 )

 

Back to the point, maybe, he mentioned, well suggested his fear, over such thinks as Wikipedia.

 

WUML - Formerly WJUL - 91.5 FM, (same freq. as WMFO ) ( http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/46648/index.php )

 

Although it logically makes sense for the Creative Commons http://codepunk.hardwar.org.uk/ahtml25.htm) "radio buttons"(not the 'old auto radios whereby in order to "preset" a station you pulled out one of the five or so buttons - for lack of recalling their actual name) to ignore anyparticular licence chosen if one does select the main heading Creative Commons." Maybe this ought to be "noted" for those of us who aren't always logical (romantics).

To clarify, it appears that if you don't select the CC choice but go directly to selecting a CC license of your choice then whatever was set, be it "Public Domain" default or 'Corprate Right (Copyright) will be selected, thus rightly, logically, ignoring your "choice."

 

I know some may say this is not the place but "persistent annoyance" thinks Two Senses of Outeach, suporting mass independent media in any way one can, being critical of things you value and appreciate, knowing Another "Preventive" War is Possble, concern over those who use airwaves for propagating trademarks without critical anaylsis, or the road race I briefy saw reminded me of Proprietary Audio Run - never mind - and a lot of other things that some will surely think are silly. Rosa "Integration" Parks (http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Mar2004/chen0304.html )

br/> An apt excerpt from "The New Crisis of Democracy"

 

"New" implies there was an old" crisis: Triumphs of Democracy by Noam Chomsky Excerpted from Language and Responsibility, Pantheon, 1977 (from http://www.chomsky.info/ emphasis added)

 

A Conversation with Noam Chomsky

 

"On the other hand, there’s a tremendous amount of energy and activism, just very disorganized.

 

One of the main reasons I go to give lots of talks is that it brings together people from that town or city or region who are working along pretty similar lines, or at least parallel lines, and don’t have much to do with each other. If you just take Boston, there are lots and lots of groups. But they barely know about each other. The total level of participation is probably quite substantial. On the other hand, the degree of integration is slight and the degree of involvement varies. That means there’s not much in the way of long-term thinking or planning or strategy."

 

G/E - not the one bringing great profits to its shareholders (and don't forget those who 'Bow to Shareholders regarding Bhopal and responsibilty, thinks its an understatement that there could be more "integration" between individuals, groups and others who know that underlying the "concision" of peace theremust be justice, not just for a privileged 'sum.

 

Those who need nicely flowing sentences the connection of integration and proprietary was after seeing just Proprietary Desktop Functioning for "flyers regarding "Country's Mother: Rosa Parks and anyone who chooses to make something their "Lifelong Day."

 

Advanced CSS Lesson 15: Cross-Browser Issues (if you are not familar with Cascading StyleSheets (CSS) then "you can "backtrack" from Advanced CSS Index

. It goes for those curious as to why some IMC articles appear as a lot of blank space intermixed with text and images, etc. os most likley the HTML file rendered properly before being "posted" in an IMC Newswire, but then something went astray in the use of (http://www.w3.org/2002/03/csslayout-howto";) HTML Tables, no DIV boxes!

 

Dave Raggett's Introduction to CSS

 

 

Not another 'Corporate Right but a Copyleft, Creative Commons...)

 

Have to "run", was going to better document the non-problem of choosing or not CC licensing.

 

 

 

http://codepunk.hardwar.org.uk/ahtml25.htm

 

http://www.goer.org/HTML/advanced/tables/

 

Would have liked to touch upon that "man of rhetoric" comment, not even dredging the "memory hole" but just bringing up "the past" in context of a discussion, the nerve of citing "scholars"....but that might push things more than already done.

 

The note was not intended to be the default "This work is in the public domain" but one of the Creative Commons license.

 

Creative Commons License

 

Link of Integration and "Country's Mother: Rosa "Integration" Parks, RIP" are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

 

 

From Boston's IMC but modified just to show selection of licenses:

An explanation of each of the license choices will pop up when you click on the text or icon

[default] Public Domain; no rights reserved.

[choice box] Copyright; all rights reserved by the author.

[choice box - rightly so, if not selected then particular CC license below is not selected and whatever above choice will take effect] Creative Commons license; some rights reserved.